ANR-1132 ESTIMATING LAND VALUE FOR GROWING TIMBER ON AGRICULTURAL LAND
ANR-1132, New Sept 1998. Daowei
Zhang, Extension Forester, Assistant Professor, Forestry, Auburn University
| Estimating Land Value for Growing
Timber on Agricultural Land |
Due to a lack of rain during the growing seasons and a
reduction in both price and number of pounds of quota in recent
years, many peanut and cotton farmers across the state (especially
in southeast Alabama) have been forced to look for areas in which
to cut costs and ways to diversify their operations. Some landowners
are considering growing timber on some of their lands.
This publication presents a method for estimating land value
if the land is converted from agricultural to forestry use. Pitfalls
in the estimation procedure and factors that influence the rate
of return on forestry investments are discussed. Hopefully, farmers
and other landowners can use this information to make good land-use
decisions.
How Much Is Your Land Worth Now?
Before considering changing land use to forestry, you need
to know how much your land is worth in current use or in potential
uses, such as development. You can find this out using comparable
sales in your local market, or you can estimate it yourself. If
your land has been used for crops and pasture and does not have
real estate development potential, you can estimate your per-acre
land value by dividing the per-acre net income (profit) from crops
and pasture by your alternative annual interest rate as follows:
land value ($/acre) = annual net income ($/acre) divided
by alternative annual interest rate
Annual net income equals total revenues minus total costs,
including the costs of labor, machinery, seeds, fertilization,
and other capital and materials. If you work for yourself, be
sure to include your salary in the costs because you could use
your labor and earn income doing something else. Because net income
fluctuates over time, you need to use your average of the last
few years in your estimation. If you rent your land, you can also
use cash rent or crop-share rent as an alternative estimate of
your annual net income.
The alternative annual interest rate is the annual rate of
return that you as an investor seek on your investments. You could
sell your land, settle up with the Internal Revenue Service, and
make investments in CDs, government securities, stocks and bonds,
and/or mutual funds. Generally speaking, a high rate of return
is associated with high risk. For example, stock markets, measured
as the S&P 500 Index, produced an average annual rate of return
of 10.4 percent from 1960 though 1994. However, the rates of return
were negative in 8 of the 25 years. Investing in long-term government
bonds in the same period would have given you an average annual
rate of return of 5.6 percent per year with less loss. After inflation
of 3 percent, these returns (real returns, so-called) amount to
7.4 and 2.6 percent, respectively.
Example: Dothan farmer Mr. Joe's average annual net
income in operating a peanut farm is $80 per acre for the last
5 years, and his alternative rate of return is 9 percent. Note
that Joe's alternative interest rate includes inflation. Since
the average annual inflation rate is about 3 percent, Joe's real
interest rate is about 6 percent. Under normal circumstances (or
assuming that history will repeat itself), his land is theoretically
worth about $1,333 per acre ($80/0.06) if he continues his peanut
operation.
Factors Influencing Forest Land Value
The interest rate affects your land value no matter what you
use your land for. In addition, several other factors influence
the land value for growing timber. These factors are timber growth
and yield, stumpage prices, planting and management costs, cost
share payments and taxes, and multiple-use opportunities such
as hunting or recreational leases.
Growth and Yield
Before estimating revenues from selling timber, you need to
first determine what kind and how much timber will be available
for sale as the timber is harvested. The period of time from tree
planting to final harvest is called a rotation. Tree growth in
a rotation depends on the quality of the land. This is called
site quality and is often referred to as the site index.
Site index is the average height of the dominant and codominant
(taller) trees at a designated age, usually 25 years for plantations.
To estimate the site index of your land, you can measure or
estimate the average height of dominant and codominant trees in
a pine plantation that is close to your land and resembles your
land in quality (soils, aspect, and slope). Use Table 1 to locate
the site index. Of course, you can also ask a professional forester
about the site index of your land.
Table 1.
Average Total Height in Feet of Dominant and Codominant Trees
by Age and Site Index for Loblolly Pine Plantations
|
Site Index (Age 25) |
| Age |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
| 10 |
18 |
22 |
27 |
31 |
38 |
| 15 |
28 |
34 |
42 |
47 |
55 |
| 20 |
35 |
43 |
52 |
60 |
69 |
| 25 |
40 |
50 |
60 |
70 |
80 |
| 30 |
43 |
54 |
66 |
78 |
78 |
| 35 |
46 |
58 |
71 |
84 |
95 |
| Source: McKee, Bill, and David
Moorhead. 1986. Site, Stocking and Expected Yields of Loblolly
Pine Plantations. Alabama Cooperative Extension System publication
ANR-398. |
Example: In a 17-year-old loblolly pine stand, the average
height of dominant and codominant trees is 45 feet. In Table 1
under the Age column, locate 15 and 20 years (17 is between 15
and 20). In the lines to the right of 15 and 20, find the two
numbers nearest 45. The nearest numbers are 42 in line 15 and
52 in line 20, and they appear in the column 60. Therefore, the
quality of the land is about site index 60.
Once you know the site index of your land and the species you
want to plant, you could find expected timber yields from growth
and yield tables. A popular species in Alabama is loblolly pine.
Table 2 presents per-acre loblolly pine yield estimates.
Table 2.
Per-Acre Loblolly Pine Yield Estimates
| Site Index |
Trees Per
Acre Planted * |
First Thinning ** |
Second Thinning *** |
Clear-Cut |
|
|
Age |
PW |
Age |
PW |
CNS |
STS |
Age |
PW |
CNS |
STS |
|
|
15 |
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
3.4 |
15.6 |
2.6 |
|
681 |
15 |
6.7 |
23 |
2.1 |
5.6 |
|
30 |
1.2 |
7.1 |
5.5 |
|
|
15 |
6.7 |
25 |
2.2 |
7.0 |
|
35 |
1.0 |
6.9 |
6.7 |
| 50 |
|
|
15 |
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
3.9 |
15.6 |
2.4 |
| |
778 |
15 |
7.0 |
23 |
2.2 |
5.4 |
|
30 |
1.3 |
9.6 |
4.4 |
| |
|
15 |
7.0 |
25 |
2.6 |
6.5 |
|
35 |
1.1 |
7.5 |
6.3 |
| |
|
15 |
15.3 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
2.1 |
13.2 |
7.0 |
| |
681 |
15 |
15.3 |
23 |
1.1 |
6.3 |
1.0 |
30 |
0.7 |
6.0 |
9.1 |
| |
|
15 |
15.3 |
25 |
1.1 |
7.7 |
4.2 |
35 |
0.6 |
5.3 |
10.7 |
| 60 |
| |
|
15 |
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
2.3 |
13.9 |
6.4 |
| |
778 |
15 |
15.7 |
23 |
1.4 |
7.2 |
|
30 |
0.7 |
6.0 |
9.2 |
| |
|
15 |
15.7 |
25 |
1.5 |
7.4 |
1.2 |
35 |
0.6 |
5.7 |
10.6 |
| |
|
15 |
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
1.4 |
11.7 |
11.9 |
| |
681 |
15 |
24.1 |
23 |
0.7 |
5.3 |
5.5 |
30 |
0.6 |
4.9 |
12.7 |
| |
|
15 |
24.1 |
25 |
0.8 |
7.1 |
4.7 |
35 |
0.5 |
4.1 |
13.8 |
| 70 |
| |
|
15 |
24.1 |
|
|
|
|
25 |
1.9 |
13.4 |
10.5 |
| |
778 |
15 |
24.1 |
23 |
1.2 |
7.5 |
2.1 |
30 |
0.6 |
5.0 |
12.6 |
| |
|
15 |
24.1 |
25 |
1.1 |
6.6 |
6.1 |
35 |
0.6 |
5.2 |
14.0 |
|
Source: McKee, Bill, and David Moorhead. 1986.
Site, Stocking and Expected Yields of Loblolly Pine Plantations.
Alabama Cooperative Extension System publication ANR-398.
*A first-year survival rate of 85 percent
is assumed.
**Row selection thinning; one row out of six
is harvested, with selection thinning on the remaining five rows.
Residual basal area after thinning is 80 square feet per acre.
***Individual trees are selected for removal.
Residual basal area after thinning is 80 square feet per acre.
NOTE: PW = pulpwood harvested in cords per acre; CNS = chip and
saw harvested in cords per acre; STS = sawtimber harvested in
thousand board feet (MBF) per acre, Scribner log rule.
|
Stumpage Prices
Most landowners sell their timber on the stump (standing timber)
to a timber dealer or manufacturer. Stumpage price is the value
of the standing timber. To estimate timber sale revenue, you need
to know what price to expect when you are ready to sell timber.
Current stumpage prices can be obtained from your local markets
through consultants or Timber Mart-South, a quarterly forest
products market report available through your county Extension
office or the Alabama Forestry Commission. Average Alabama stumpage
prices for 1997 are presented in Table 3.
Table 3.
Average Alabama Pine Stumpage Prices for 1997
|
Pulpwood (cord) |
Chip-N-Saw (cord) |
Sawtimber
(MBF, Scribner) |
| Northern Alabama* |
$31.79 |
$86.34 |
$346.00 |
| Southern Alabama* |
$33.01 |
$98.20 |
$389.50 |
| Average |
$32.40 |
$92.27 |
$367.75 |
|
Source: Timber-Mart South
*The dividing line can be drawn from Auburn
to Prattville to Demopolis.
|
Unlike those of most other natural resources, real timber prices
have appreciated constantly over the last 100 years (Clawson 1979).
From 1977 to 1996, the rate of real price appreciation for pine
pulpwood in Alabama was about 1.5 percent annually, and the rates
for chip-n-saw and pine sawtimber were about 3.9 and 2.0 percent,
respectively (Zhang 1998). Hardwood stumpage price appreciated
even more than pine did. Remember that this is a real appreciation
over and above the general inflation rate.
Example: Assuming conservatively that the real stumpage
price increases at 1 percent annually, the real pulpwood price
in southern Alabama is expected to be 33 x (1+0.01)15 = 33 x 1.16
= $38.3 per cord in 15 years. The real prices for sawtimber and
chip-n-saw can be calculated in the same fashion. Table 4 presents
the expected real prices for these three products in southern
Alabama in 3 selected years assuming a 1 percent increase over
time.
Table 4.
Expected Southern Pine Real Stumpage Price Appreciation for Southern
Alabama in 15, 23, and 30 years
| Products |
Current Price |
Year |
Compound Factor |
Real Price |
| Pulpwood |
$33 |
15 |
(1+0.01) to the 15 power = 1.16 |
$38.30 |
|
|
23 |
(1+0.01) to the 23 power = 1.26 |
$41.50 |
|
|
30 |
(1+0.01) to the 30 power = 1.35 |
$44.50 |
| Chip-n-saw |
$98 |
23 |
1.26 |
$123.20 |
|
|
30 |
1.35 |
$132.10 |
| Sawtimber |
$390 |
30 |
1.35 |
$525.70 |
Planting and Management Costs
Investing in timber growing may involve preparing the site;
planting; controlling herbaceous vegetation; thinning; protecting
against fire, insects, and diseases; administering timber sales;
and paying annual taxes. Not every timber grower will have all
these expenses, but all will have some costs in growing timber.
Such costs can be thought of as investments, or outlays, that
must be made to grow certain kinds of timber in a certain way.
An experienced forester can provide you with various forest management
costs. Dubois et al. (1997) provided a current and historical
summary of forest management costs in the Southern Coastal Plain.
Since most farmlands are in good shape, you may not need to
spend any money on site preparation. The seedling costs are about
$25 per 800 (800 trees per acre is a good planting density in
the state). Planting costs are about $40 per acre on cropland.
One chemical treatment for vegetation control is expected to take
place in year 5, and prescribed burning is expected to start at
year 12 and continue on a 4-year cycle until final harvest. The
annual management costs should be minimal and can be offset by
the hunting lease income (see below).
Table 5 presents the expected management activities and costs
in a single rotation. Since some costs (prescribed burning) are
expected to increase faster (about 5 percent annually) than the
annual rate of inflation, the real expected costs are adjusted
accordingly. Other costs (vegetation control and consulting fees)
are expected to change at roughly the same pace as inflation and
need not be adjusted at all.
Table 5. Expected
Costs Per Acre for Pine Plantation Establishment and Management
| Yr. |
Activity* |
Current Costs |
Compound Factors |
Expected Real Costs |
Discounted Costs |
| 1 |
Planting |
$65 |
1 |
$65 |
$65 |
| 5 |
Herbaceous weed control |
$54 |
1 |
$54 |
$54/1.338=$40 |
| 12 |
Prescribed burning** |
$15 |
(1+0.05) to the 12 power = 1.79 |
$27 |
$27/2.012=$13 |
| 15 |
Consulting fees for 1st thinning*** |
|
|
$60* |
$60/2.396=$25 |
| 16 |
Prescribed burning |
$15 |
(1+0.05) to the 16 power = 2.18 |
$33 |
$33/2.540=$13 |
| 20 |
Prescribed burning |
$15 |
(1+0.05) to the 20 power = 2.65 |
$40 |
$40/3.207=$13 |
| 23 |
Consulting fees for 2nd thinning*** |
|
|
$95* |
$95/3.819=$25 |
| 24 |
Prescribed burning |
$15 |
(1+0.05) to the 24 power = 3.24 |
$49 |
$49/4.048=$12 |
| 28 |
Prescribed burning |
$15 |
(1+0.05) to the 28 power = 3.92 |
$59 |
$59/5.111=$12 |
| 30 |
Consulting fees for final harvest*** |
|
|
$566* |
$566/5.743=$99 |
| |
|
|
|
Total |
$317 |
|
*No annual management costs are estimated.
Hunting lease income is assured to equal annual management costs.
**Prescribed burning begins at age 12 and
continues on a 4-year cycle until the end of the rotation.
***Consulting fees are 10 percent of the sale
revenue. If you do not use a consulting forester, treat the costs
as the costs of your own labor and time.
|
Cost-Share Payments and Taxes
About ten federal, state, and private cost-share programs are
available to many landowners for tree planting and other forest-management
activities such as wildlife habitat enhancement. The federal programs
include the Forest Incentive Program (FIP), Stewardship Incentive
Program (SIP), Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), Environmental
Quality Incentive Program (EQIP), and Wildlife Habitat Incentive
Program (WHIP). The state cost-share program is the Alabama Agriculture
and Conservation Development Commission Program (AACDCP). A cost-share
program administered by Alabama Power Company (the Openland Tree
Planting Program) is also available to landowners to plant trees
in open land. Although many landowners use these programs and
receive sizable payments, there is no guarantee that you will
be successful in obtaining these benefits. Therefore, we will
assume that the landowner will absorb all forest establishment
and management costs.
Landowners must pay property taxes, and the taxes are roughly
equal whether the land is used to grow crops or trees. Forestry
investment makes many landowners qualify for capital gains tax
treatment. In addition, a federal reforestation tax incentive
allows a 10 percent investment tax credit plus a 7-year amortization
of $9,500 on the first $10,000 of qualified reforestation expenditures
each year. This is available to virtually all landowners. Because
of the wide range in individual tax brackets and alternative rates
of return, this analysis will not include income tax issues. All
results in this report are stated on a before-tax basis.
Multiple-Use Opportunities
Forests provide many nontimber benefits, including wildlife,
outdoor recreation, clean water, and scenic beauty. Some of these
may have economic value to the landowner. Currently, the average
price for hunting lease is about $3.00 per acre. If you have a
tract of timberland large enough for hunting lease (150 acres),
the income from the lease is usually sufficient to cover annual
management costs. Other nontimber benefits are not considered
in this analysis.
How Much Is Your Land Worth if You Plant Southern
Pine Trees?
Now you are ready to calculate the value of your land for forestry
use. Using data from the first complete rotation,
land value = discounted revenue minus discounted management
cost minus reforestation cost
where
discounted revenue = stumpage price x timber volume divided
by compound factor
and
discounted management cost = management cost divided by
compound factor
Example: Joe's real discount rate is 6 percent (9 percent
nominal 3 percent inflation). His land has a site index of 60
feet. He plans to plant 778 loblolly pines per acre, to thin the
forest at ages 15 and 23, and to clear-cut at age 30. The real
price of stumpage is expected to change at about 1 percent annually
during the 30-year rotation.
From Table 2, locate site index 60 and 778 trees per acre,
you will find that Joe should expect to harvest 15.7 cords of
pulpwood per acre at age 15; 1.4 cords of pulpwood and 7.2 cords
of chip and saw at age 23; and 0.7 cords of pulpwood, 6 cords
of chip-n-saw, and 9.2 thousand board feet of sawtimber at age
30. Multiplying the volumes by expected real prices (last column
of Table 4) and adding up across products gives the total revenue
for ages 15 ($601), 23 ($945), and 30 ($5,660).
Since money received in the future has to be discounted to
the present, you need to find a compound factor (the equivalent
of $1 at present in 15, 23, and 30 years, using a discount rate).
Table 6 presents the compounding factors at discount rates of
3, 6, 9, and 12 percent. In Table 6, you will find the compound
factors are 2.396, 3.819, and 5.743 for ages 15, 23, and 30 for
an interest rate of 6 percent. Dividing each revenue by the appropriate
compound factor gives you the present value of the total net revenues
for the first rotation--$1,497.
Table 6.
Compound Factors: Value of $1 (Computed Annually) at the End of
a Period of N Years Earning R% Annual Interest
| 3% |
6% |
Years |
9% |
12% |
| 1.030 |
1.060 |
1 |
1.090 |
1.120 |
| 1.060 |
1.123 |
2 |
1.188 |
1.254 |
| 1.092 |
1.191 |
3 |
1.295 |
1.404 |
| 1.125 |
1.262 |
4 |
1.411 |
1.573 |
| 1.159 |
1.338 |
5 |
1.538 |
1.762 |
| 1.194 |
1.418 |
6 |
1.677 |
1.973 |
| 1.229 |
1.503 |
7 |
1.828 |
2.210 |
| 1.266 |
1.593 |
8 |
1.992 |
2.475 |
| 1.304 |
1.689 |
9 |
2.171 |
2.773 |
| 1.343 |
1.790 |
10 |
2.367 |
3.105 |
| 1.384 |
1.898 |
11 |
2.580 |
3.478 |
| 1.425 |
2.012 |
12 |
2.812 |
3.895 |
| 1.468 |
2.132 |
13 |
3.065 |
4.363 |
| 1.512 |
2.260 |
14 |
3.341 |
4.887 |
| 1.557 |
2.396 |
15 |
3.642 |
5.473 |
| 1.604 |
2.540 |
16 |
3.970 |
6.130 |
| 1.652 |
2.692 |
17 |
4.327 |
6.866 |
| 1.702 |
2.854 |
18 |
4.717 |
7.689 |
| 1.753 |
3.025 |
19 |
5.141 |
8.612 |
| 1.806 |
3.207 |
20 |
5.604 |
9.646 |
| 1.860 |
3.399 |
21 |
6.108 |
10.803 |
| 1.916 |
3.603 |
22 |
6.658 |
12.100 |
| 1.973 |
3.819 |
23 |
7.257 |
13.522 |
| 2.032 |
4.048 |
24 |
7.911 |
15.178 |
| 2.093 |
4.291 |
25 |
8.623 |
17.000 |
| 2.156 |
4.549 |
26 |
9.399 |
19.040 |
| 2.221 |
4.822 |
27 |
10.245 |
21.324 |
| 2.287 |
5.111 |
28 |
11.167 |
23.883 |
| 2.356 |
5.418 |
29 |
12.172 |
26.749 |
| 2.427 |
5.743 |
30 |
13.267 |
29.959 |
| 2.813 |
7.686 |
35 |
20.413 |
52.799 |
| 3.262 |
10.285 |
40 |
31.409 |
93.050 |
| 3.781 |
13.764 |
45 |
48.327 |
163.987 |
| 4.383 |
18.420 |
50 |
74.357 |
289.002 |
| 5.082 |
24.650 |
55 |
114.408 |
509.320 |
| 5.891 |
32.987 |
60 |
176.031 |
897.596 |
Now you need to figure out the present value of the management
costs or the discounted management costs. Table 5 gives the expected
costs for pine plantation establishment and management and years
in which the activity will be carried out. Notice again that the
expected real cost for prescribed burning has increased about
5 percent more than the rate of inflation has, and the costs for
herbaceous weed control and consulting fees increase at about
the same rate as inflation. Therefore, compound factors have been
used to adjust the expected real costs. Dividing the expected
real costs by the appropriate compound factors (6 percent interest)
gives the discounted establishment and management costs (the last
column of Table 5). The total discounted establishment and management
costs for the first rotation are $317.
Therefore, the expected present value of per-acre profit for
planting pine trees in 30 years is calculated as follows:
$1,497 minus $317 = $1,180
Since you could use the land for continuous rotation (that
is, you get $1,180 every 30 years) forever, the total land value
is:
$1,180 + 1,180 divided by 1.06 to the 30 power + 1,180 divided
by 1.06 to the 60 power + ... = 1,180 divided by (1 minus 1.06
to the 30 power) = $1,428
Pitfalls in Estimating Forest Land Value
As you see, estimating the value of land used in timber production
can be complicated, primarily because of the long growing period
for timber and the associated time value of money--a dollar spent
or received today is not equal in present value to a dollar to
be spent or received in the future. There are two major pitfalls
in estimating forest land value.
First, some people use the stumpage price or interest rate
improperly in estimating the total revenue and costs. Stumpage
prices can be nominal or real, as can interest rates. You can
use the real stumpage price and real interest rate, as in the
above example, or the nominal stumpage price and the nominal interest
rate. To use the latter method, you have to add inflation in your
forecast of stumpage prices. You should not, however, use real
stumpage prices and nominal interest rates. Some people unfamiliar
with forestry take today's stumpage price as the future stumpage
price and today's interest rate, which includes inflation, to
calculate forest land value. Estimating forest land value this
way may often end up with a conclusion that forestry investments
are not profitable. This method is incorrect and should be avoided.
On the other hand, using nominal prices and real interest rates
will greatly exaggerate the return on forestry investments.
Second, the real stumpage prices and some management costs
are increasing faster than the rate of inflation is. In the previous
example, the future real appreciation of stumpage price (price
appreciation above inflation) and rising costs of prescribed burning
are considered. Had we not considered the real price appreciation
of stumpage and the rising real costs of prescribed burning, the
land value would have been $954 per acre, a far cry from $1,428
per acre.
Other Factors Influencing Investment in Forestry
Growing timber rather than crops has its drawbacks. Some of
them are real, and others are perceived. The real drawbacks are
irregular revenues and possible option costs. A perceived drawback
is the physical risk of forests. Finally, the "endowment
effect" makes some farmers stick with agricultural enterprises
longer than basic economics would justify.
Irregular Revenues
Unlike an agricultural operation which hopefully brings a landowner
income every year, revenues from forestry investments often begin
more than 10 years after trees are planted and will recur only
periodically until final harvest. Unless you have a sufficiently
large forestry operation (more than 300 acres) and well-distributed
age classes of timber, you will have some years without timber
revenue. However, this should not be a problem if your primary
income is not from forestry operation.
Option Costs
Because of the long production period of forestry, landowners
could hardly change their operation before the timber is mature
once committed to forestry. This is a so-called "option cost."
However, this cost may not be real or large because landowners
can sell their young plantations or lease them unless they want
total control of their lands. The markets for timberland sales
or leases are very active in Alabama and other southern states.
In addition, this seeming cost can sometimes be beneficial because
landowners can have the option of holding timber for a growing
season or more to wait for favorable prices to minimize income
tax liabilities.
Physical Risk of Forests
Contrary to popular belief, forests possess a relatively low
physical risk or loss due to fire, insects, and disease. Established
forests have a higher level of stress tolerance than most crops
do. Fire, insects, and disease currently affect slightly over
2 million of the more than 200 million acres of southern forests
annually. A stand of trees is seldom totally destroyed, and damaged
trees frequently have value. This is particularly true for well-managed
forests. Diversification among stand ages and parcel locations
further reduces physical risks in most cases. Regular thinning
can greatly reduce the risk of southern pine beetle, one of the
major causes of timber loss in Alabama.
Endowment Effect
People often value an asset they have held for a period of
time more than the market is willing to pay for it. This is the
so-called "endowment effect." Some owners who have been
using their land for agriculture for years may find it hard to
give up agricultural land use even if growing timber is more profitable.
Research studies clearly indicate the financial rewards of
changing some agricultural land to forestry use. Landowners who
intend to invest in forestry can obtain forest management assistance
from consulting foresters, industry foresters, or public foresters
from the Alabama Forestry Commission, the Natural Resources Conservation
Service (NRCS), or the Alabama Cooperative Extension System (ACES).
A list of consulting foresters can be obtained from your county
Extension office or local Alabama Forestry Commission office.
For landowners with internet access, Web sites, such as the one
developed by the Auburn University School of Forestry Private
Forest Management Team (www.prmt.org), can provide useful information.
References
Clawson, Marion. 1979. Forestry in the Long Sweep of American
History. Science 204: 1168 - 74.
Dubois, Mark, Ken McNabb, and Thomas Straka. 1997. Costs and
Costs Trends for Forestry Practices in the South. Forest Landowners.
31st Manual Edition.
Zhang, Daowei, and John Bliss. 1998. Alabama Stumpage Price
Trends. Alabama Cooperative Extension System publication ANR-1086.
For more information, contact your county Extension
office. Look in your telephone directory under your county's name
to find the number.
For more information, contact your county Extension office. Visit http://www.aces.edu/counties or look in your telephone directory under your county's name to find contact information.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work in agriculture and
home economics, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, and other related
acts, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Alabama
Cooperative Extension System (Alabama A&M University and Auburn
University) offers educational programs, materials, and equal
opportunity employment to all people without regard to race, color,
national origin, religion, sex, age, veteran status, or disability.
|
If you have problems loading
this document, please email publications@aces.edu
for assistance.
Publications Homepage | ACES Homepage
|