ANR-1038 THE INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT APPROACH TO CROP PRODUCTION
ANR-1038, New Sept 1997. Geoff
Zehnder, Extension Entomologist,
Associate Professor, and Mark Rumph, Extension Assistant,
Agriculture Programs; both in Entomology at Auburn University
| The Integrated
Pest Management Approach To Crop Production |
What Is IPM?
IPM is a sustainable approach to managing pests
by combining cultural, biological, chemical, and physical tools
in a way that minimizes economic, health, and environmental risks.
IPM relies heavily on current knowledge of pests and their interaction
with the crop system to select the best combination of pest management
tools.
Therefore, IPM is not a single product that
can be purchased, like a drum of pesticide, and it does not rely
on one "silver bullet" method to solve all our pest
problems. We have learned through experience that pests adapt
very quickly to single control tactics through natural selection,
and that multiple methods used simultaneously, or an "integrated"
approach, is the most effective for long-term, sustainable management
programs.
IPM is not organic production. Nor does it
attempt to rely solely on biological control to achieve the desired
outcomes. It does often try to assist the action of natural enemies
by limiting the impact of pesticide applications on their populations.
IPM is a management approach that encourages
natural control of pests where possible. It seeks to restore some
balance between the crop and the natural environment. In the IPM
concept, use of pesticides involves a trade-off between pest control
and the risks of adverse effects on non-target organisms, such
as natural enemies, pollinators, wildlife, and plants, and contamination
of soil and water.
Using IPM In Crop Production
The foundation of IPM is regular monitoring
of the crop or habitat to identify pests and their potential for
damage. This provides knowledge of the current pest and crop situation
that is critical in selecting the best possible combination of
management methods. Most farmers already use IPM in some form
or another but may be unaware of it because IPM can include many
different methods.
IPM methods include threshold assessment and
biological, chemical, cultural, and physical or mechnical controls.
Threshold assessment is based on the concept that most plants can tolerate
at least some pest damage before economic loss of yield occurs.
Much research has been done to determine this level of damage,
often called the economic injury level, for a variety of crop
and pest situations. In an IPM program where the economic injury
level or threshold is known, chemical controls are applied only
when the pest capacity for damage is nearing the threshold. When
an economic injury level has not been established, common sense
is used, and controls are applied when it appears that pest numbers
are increasing to damaging levels.
Biological controls include natural enemies, such as insect predators,
parasitic wasps, or nematodes. In IPM programs, native natural
enemy populations are conserved, and non-native agents may be
introduced. Many disease organisms that attack pests are exploited
as biological control agents and are commercially developed for
application to crops. Genetically transformed crops with pest
resistance may also be considered in the biological control category.
Chemical controls are used to keep populations below economically damaging
levels when pests cannot be controlled by other means. Pesticides
with the least negative impacts on non-target organisms and the
environment are most useful in IPM programs. Fortunately, new
generation pesticides with novel modes of action and low environmental
impacts are being developed and registered for use.
Cultural control methods are really crop production practices that make
the crop environment less suitable for pest development. Crop
rotation and fallowing, manipulating of planting and harvest dates,
manipulation of plant and row spacing, and destruction of old
crop debris are just a few examples of cultural methods used to
manage pest populations. Cultural controls are selected based
on knowledge of pest biology and development.
Physical or mechanical controls
based on knowledge of pest behavior
can help farmers develop physical barriers or traps to keep pests
away. The best way to eliminate invasion of household pests, for
example, is to seal cracks to the outside and other sites of entry
around the home. Placing plastic-lined trenches along potato fields
to trap migrating Colorado potato beetles in the spring and fall
is one example of a physical control. Using mulches to smother
weeds and providing row covers to protect plants from insects
are other examples. Hand picking of insect pests--perhaps the
most simple pest control method--is another physical control often
practiced by home gardeners.
 |
|
 |
| Weather monitoring system for timing fungicide
applications. |
|
Pheromone trap used to monitor insect pest
populations. |
Benefits Of Using IPM
The adoption of IPM provides many benefits.
- It increases profits and makes producers
more competitive.
- It provides consumers with a safe, high-quality
supply of food and other agricultural products.
- It helps sustain natural resources, and reduces
environmental and human health risks associated with pesticide
use on farms, ranches, and range lands.
- In urban settings, IPM can manage household
and landscape pests with low pesticide-use strategies.
- IPM adoption opens and enhances new export
markets.
- It also supports new business opportunities
in the pest management industry and in the development and marketing
of new IPM products.
The U. S. Department of Agriculture has fully
supported and encouraged the use of IPM by farmers in order to
insure the future profitability, sustainability, and competitiveness
of U. S. agriculture. In 1993, the USDA issued a goal of implementing
IPM practices on 75 percent of U. S. cropland by the year 2000.
The Federal government views IPM as an investment in the future
of American agriculture as well as a contribution to a cleaner
environment.
 |
Habitat enhancement with clover
to attract beneficial insects to cabbage plantings. |
| |
|
 |
Predatory stink bug feeding on
potato beetle larva. |
For more information, contact your county Extension
office. Look in your telephone directory under your county's name
to find the number.
For more information, contact your county Extension office. Visit http://www.aces.edu/counties or look in your telephone directory under your county's name to find contact information.
Issued in furtherance of Cooperative Extension work in agriculture and
home economics, Acts of May 8 and June 30, 1914, and other related
acts, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The Alabama
Cooperative Extension System (Alabama A&M University and Auburn
University) offers educational programs, materials, and equal
opportunity employment to all people without regard to race, color,
national origin, religion, sex, age, veteran status, or disability.
|
If you have problems loading
this document, please email publications@aces.edu
for assistance.
Publications Homepage | ACES Homepage
|