Auburn,
Sept. 10, 2002 --- Last summer, Jimmy Newby noticed some of his
best yielding cotton was showing stress, but he was at a loss to
explain why.
He first blamed it on fertility, then hardpan and
then water drainage.
Horace Haney, right, who, along with his brother
and their two sons, farms 4,600 acres of cotton in the Tennessee
Valley, discusses crop conditions with Curtis Grissom, Limestone
County Extension coordinator. Haney is one of many cotton producers
in the Valley whose fields have tested positive for reniform
nematodes that have caused steep yield reductions in some areas.
Finally, after ruling out all three, he began
suspecting another culprit. Soil sampling confirmed his suspicions.
As it turned out, his problems were caused by reniform nematodes
that had somehow crossed over the nearby Tennessee River into his
cropland.
As he recalls, "It was one of the biggest
surprises of my life."
Newby is one of many producers in the Tennessee
Valley region of North Alabama coping with this summer surprise.
"They’re really hard to distinguish,"
says Horace Haney, a producer in nearby Tanner, who also farms
cropland that has tested positive for nematodes. "You blame it
on seed, dry weather, insects, and all the time, it’s
nematodes."
This year, experts have discovered a substantial
percentage of North Alabama cropland has been affected by the
pathogen, which, until only a few years ago, was a problem
associated primarily with the southern part of the state.
"Probably about 20 percent of acreage is
affected, if not more," says Newby’s local agent, Limestone
County Extension Agent Curtis Grissom.
"Some growers probably haven’t yet determined
it’s a big enough reason to invest the time and money to combat
it. But as time passes, you’ll have more realizing that it is a
problem.
"It’s here to stay, and we’ve got to find
ways to combat it."
The problem for Newby and other producers is that
very little is currently available in their region to deal with
nematodes.
Temik applied either immediately before or during
planting has helped, but producers still face the added challenge of
deciding what to do further into the growing season.
For his part, Newby applies Temik during planting,
followed by two sprayings of the foliar insecticide Vydate, which
has some effect on nematodes.
"It isn’t a foolproof deal, but somehow we’ve
been able to keep the numbers from becoming astronomical,"
Newby says.
"If we ever got it as bad as folks in South
Alabama, we’d have to quit cotton entirely or find some way to use
Telone or something else that is foolproof."
Telone, a far more effective control for nematodes,
is currently not a viable option for Valley producers. For it to
work effectively, it must be injected into a seedbed -- 12 to 18
inches beneath the surface -- in soil that has been adequately
pulverized, with clods and residue removed.
Seedbeds, however, are ill suited to North Alabama,
partly because of the clay soils but also because of the widespread
adoption of no-till and other reduced tillage systems.
And there is the added problem of expense.
Telone costs between $30 and $40 an acre – not an
attractive option to many producers in an age when reducing input
costs are as vital to long-term survival as increasing yields are.
That leaves corn rotation, which, in most cases is
equally impractical unless producers can irrigate.
"But even with irrigation, rotation is no
panacea," Newby says.
"We’ve had some of our acreage in corn, but
by the end of the next cotton crop, the numbers were back up to
where they were."
While conceding there are still a lot of unanswered
questions, Charles Burmester, Alabama Cooperative Extension System
agronomist, and Dr. Kathy McLean, Auburn University assistant
professor of plant pathology, are exploring several options at the
Tennessee Valley Research and Extension Center in Belle Mina and on
nearby private fields.
One approach involves at-planting and side dress
treatments using Temik.
Burmester is also looking at Vydate as well as
various forms of crop rotation. He and McLean are also hoping to
find nematode-resistant varieties.
"There won’t be any variety that will be
completely resistant, but we hope to find some that can tolerate
higher nematode populations," Burmester says. "We’re
looking for stopgap approaches until we get all the answers."
For now, many producers throughout the Valley are
still being blindsided by the pathogen, attributing their crop’s
poor performance to anything but nematodes.
"We went a year or two before we knew the
decline in yields was attributed to nematodes," Newby recalls.
"We looked at everything else first."
"Aside from the old problems of markets and
labor, it’s the most serious problem we’ve got. But lots of
producers still don’t know what we’re talking about."