Suburban Wildlife Encounters Becoming More Common, Expert Says

AUBURN, Feb. 9, 2004 --- Foxes, coyotes and deer?  Oh, my!

 Oh, yes.

In scores of neighborhoods across Alabama, neatly manicured suburban backyards bracketed by forestland serve as magnets for deer and other wildlife. 

Even so, many suburban residents think they’ve encountered some freak of nature whenever they see wild animals, often with fawns or pups in train, scampering down neighborhood streets.

It’s no freak of nature.  Indeed, for many species, especially deer, suburban landscapes provide almost ideal living conditions. 

“When you go in and start fragmenting the habitat into smaller tracts of land with a mixture of agriculture and wooded areas, you’re providing an ideal habitat for several wildlife species, especially white-tailed deer,” said Dr. Jim Armstrong, an Alabama Cooperative Extension System wildlife specialist and Auburn University associate professor of forestry and wildlife sciences. “True, many people associate deer with forests, especially hardwood forests.  And, yes, deer certainly use hardwood forests, but generally they prefer a mixture of habitats.”

Armstrong confessed that he has often debated whether encroachment really is an accurate or even a fair way to describe the increased presence of wildlife in suburban areas.

“To say that these animals are out of their habitats is wrong,” he said. “A habitat is something that provides food, water, shelter and space.  So if you look at it that way, you really can’t say that these animals have encroached on someone else’s habitat.  It’s just moved to a place not typically considered an animal habitat.  But it’s a habitat nevertheless because all of its basic needs are being met.”

For suburban dwellers who find these animal encounters a little, well, unsettling, there is some bad news: These encounters are likely to become even more frequent in the future as suburbia continues its sprawl into once pristine animal habitat and as animal populations continue to grow, largely due to hunting restrictions and other measures mandated by state, federal and local governments.

“They’re not going away,” he said. “And people should understand that it is going to happen no matter what they do.  If you move into a subdivision at the edge of town, it will be only a matter of time before deer begin appearing.”

All things considered, Armstrong said, it’s easy to understand why human/animal interactions are likely to emerge as one of the major environmental issues of the next decade.  He should know: Armstrong will soon be heading up The Wildlife Society’s Wildlife Damage Management Working Group, a committee composed of wildlife biologists from around the world exploring ways to resolve the increasing number of problems associated with human/animal overlap.

Ironically, Armstrong said, many of these encounters often turn out to be more of a people issue than a human/animal problem.  Indeed, some of the most serious problems occur not so much because of the animals’ presence but because of the often testy debate that arises over whether their presence is good or bad.

“Not only do you have the problem of wildlife encroachment but a clash of values among people,” Armstrong said. “It can be a major challenge, especially when you’ve got some people leaving out corn to attract deer because they think they’re neat, while other residents are complaining that the animals are eating away all of their landscape plants.”

Armstrong even questions why animal encounters should be viewed negatively. Granted, he said, there are some serious encounters that must be addressed when alligators, poisonous snakes or rabid animals are involved.  But these tend to be rare.  In most cases, animal encounters pose no threat to human safety.  So, the best thing people can do, he said, is to learn more about these encounters and to accept them as a fact of life.

“It really doesn’t have to be a negative thing,” Armstrong said.  “It can be very positive.  Wildlife is a great educational tool and generates a lot of interest among young people.  If people can capitalize on these issues and turn them into positive experiences, they will derive long-term benefits.”

[Source: Dr. James Armstrong, Extension Wildlife Specialist and Auburn University Associate Professor of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, (334) 844-9233; Writer: Jim Langcuster, News and Public Affairs Specialist, (334) 844-5686.] 

 Article in MS Word

 Article in Text

 

Further Reading:

Wildlife Control -- Clemson University

Dealing with Nuisance Wildlife -- University of Minnesota, Twin Cities

Model Guidelines for Nuisance Management Control -- The Humane Society of the United States

Nuisance Wildlife Urban/Suburban -- Department of Natural Resources, Wisconsin

Nuisance Wildlife Fact Sheets -- Department of Natural Resources, Nova Scotia

Injured Wildlife and Nuisance Wildlife --  New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Nuisance Wildlife -- New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources/Fish and Wildlife Branch

Nuisance Wildlife -- University of Florida/IFAS Extension

Nuisance Wildlife -- Maryland Department of Natural Resources

Deer Control in Home Gardens -- West Virginia Department of Natural Resources

Nuisance Wildlife -- Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources

Techniques for the Prevention and Control of Wildlife Damage in Urban and Rural Areas -- LSUAgCenter