A Service of the News and Public Affairs Unit, Extension Communications

 

2001 Archive

January

February

March

April

May

June

July

August

September

October 

November

December

Archive By Topic

Health and Nutrition

Human Sciences

Environment

Animal Science

Agronomy

Horticulture

4-H

Consumer Affairs

Back

 

Safety Net for Farmers May Be Improved

AUBURN, APRIL 5---The proposed federal budget allocation for agriculture, now awaiting action in the U.S. Senate, offers some improvement in the safety net for U.S. farmers. An agricultural economist with the Alabama Cooperative Extension System says the proposed increase in the budget would help eliminate some of the wrangling that goes on in the Congress over where money will come from for disaster funding and agricultural programs.

Poultry farmers and greenhouse operators have been hard hit in Alabama because of high energy costs, while high fertilizer costs are forcing many farmers to rethink their spring planting. Dr. Jim Novak points out that the proposed budget would provide funds in the current 2001 fiscal year in anticipation of the lost income from high fuel and fertilizer costs and the forecasts of continued depressed commodity prices.

Novak notes the budget also leaves room for additional tax reform, such as expanded income averaging provisions and creation of Farm And Ranch Risk Management (FARRM) savings accounts. With a FARRM account, a farmer could put a percentage of their farm income in a tax-deferred savings account that could be drawn on in hard times.

"FARRM accounts are a great program if farmers have money to put into them," says Novak. "But if a farmer depletes his account because of a bad season and that's followed by another bad season, then he is still in trouble. There will still be a need for other means of risk protection."

Representative Larry Combest, R.-Tex., chair of the House Agriculture Committee addressed this need during debate on the budget.

"As it should have, Congress has stepped in with emergency economic assistance in each of the last three years, and many farmers are still in business today because of that help. But the need continues. It is time to stop ad hoc assistance and move to a more permanent solution that producers, their bankers and their suppliers can count on. And this can be done in a way that provides more fiscal discipline that will benefit the taxpayer while providing more predictable support to the agricultural community," said Combest.

###

SOURCE: Dr. Jim Novak, Extension Agricultural Economist, Alabama Cooperative Extension System, (334) 844-3512