by Donald M. Ball, and
Robert A. Burdett, Jr., both Extension Agronomist/Professor,
Department of Agronomy and Soils, Auburn University.
Bermudagrass has been an important forage crop
in the South for decades, and for good reason.
It is widely adapted, has high yield potential,
and has proven to be quite useful for warm season
forage production, particularly as a hay crop.
Thus it is not surprising that the availability
of a productive, new forage bermudagrass variety
is always of interest to cattlemen in the lower
South where bermudagrass is adapted.
Most new varieties of hybrid bermudagrass, which
require propagation vegetatively from sprigs or
clippings, are developed in plant breeding programs.
However, the most recent "new variety" has actually
been around for years but has only recently attained
true variety status.
'Russell' bermudagrass was found in the late 1970's
in a field near Seale, Alabama by Donald Bice,
County Agent in Russell County. The field had originally
been planted to the Mississippi State University
variety 'Callie,' but since Callie soon winterkilled
throughout Alabama, it became clear that the grass
which had dominated the field was unique, probably
either a mutation of Callie or a natural hybrid
between Callie and common bermudagrass.
Once the impressive characteristics of this grass
were recognized, planting material was shared among
neighbors, with the result being that by 1994 there
were estimated to be over 2,000 acres in production,
mostly in or near Russell County. On-farm success
led to it being entered in variety trials at the
Plant Breeding Unit, Tallassee, in 1986 (Table
1), at the E.V. Smith Crops Unit, Shorter, in 1991
(Table 2), and at the Hill Farm Research Station
at Homer, Louisiana in 1988 (Table 3). These tests
established that this bermudagrass yields as well
as, or better than, popular hybrid bermudagrasses
which are commonly used throughout the South.
Russell has yielded better and been rated higher
for winterhardiness than 'Coastal' (Table 4), the
variety which is considered the bermudagrass standard.
It also was shown in a greenhouse test to root
better from clippings than Coastal (Table 7). No
unusual disease or insect problems have been noted
with the grass, either in variety trials (Table
4) or in over 15 years of producer experience.
Forage quality of Russell was similar to that
of several other commonly-grown bermudagrass hybrids
when grown in a test in Alabama (Table 5), but
IVDMD was lower than Coastal in a test in Louisiana
(Table 6). Rate of spread, primarily by stolons,
has been as fast or faster than any other bermudagrass
variety commonly available in Alabama or Louisiana,
with the exception of 'Tifton 85.'
A unique trait is that in the first harvest of
the season it has almost always outyielded all
other varieties to which it has been compared (Table
2). Most producers see this characteristic as being
quite valuable. If a field is to be used for pasture,
early greenup allows earlier grazing. High growth
potential in early spring when rainfall is most
dependable also gets hay production off to a good
start for the year and reduces the risk of a poor
season-long hay yield.
A quantative measurement of the weight or number
of sprigs Russell produces per unit area relative
to other bermudagrasses has not been determined.
However, it has been noted that the variety forms
a dense mass of robust rhizomes. Observation of
a sprig (rhizome) digging operation confirms that
sprig yield for planting material is excellent.
Moreover, a commercial sprigger who plants both
Coastal and Russell has reported that in his experience,
the recovery rate of stands after digging Russell
sprigs has been better than Coastal.
Russell exhibits many morphological characteristics
similar to robust common bermudagrass ecotypes.
Forage height at normal cutting stage is typically
lower than for other commonly-used bermudagrass
hybrids, but the forage is quite dense, thus allowing
high yields. It forms a thick sod which producers
have noted holds up well under grazing and which
has important implications regarding erosion prevention.
Documention of its superior forage characteristics,
as well as the need to have certified planting
material available to producers, made it apparent
that Russell should be recognized as a variety.
This led to the 1994 joint release of Russell bermudagrass
as a recognized variety by the Alabama Agricultural
Experiment Station and by the Louisiana Agricultural
Experiment Station.
The northern limit for use of this variety has
not been established, but it has persisted for
years in locations as far north as Pell City, Alabama
and Homer, Louisiana (each having a latitude similar
to Birmingham, Alabama) and it has withstood winters
in the vicinity of Russell County, Alabama for
17 years. It is believed that this variety can
make an important contribution on many farms, especially
in areas having well- drained soils and winters
which are no more harsh than those which normally
occur in central or north Alabama or north Louisiana.
Though promising new variety releases often stimulate
much producer interest, many of them ultimately
turn out to be disappointments. When new varieties
reach the farm, it is not unusual for problems
to appear that had not been previously observed.
In the case of the "new" variety Russell, we have
a bermudagrass which has already stood the test
of time and for which there is much evidence of
producer acceptance. Surprises regarding its performance
are not likely at this point.
Breeder planting stock will be maintained by the
Alabama Crop Improvement Association from which
foundation planting material will be available
beginning in spring, 1995. Persons interested in
producing certified sprigs should write this agency
at P.O. Box 2619, Auburn, AL, or call them at (205)
844-4995 or 821-7400.
|
Table 1. Dry matter yields (lb/A) of
entries in bermudagrass variety trial,Plant
Breeding Unit, Tallassee, AL, 1988-90.
|
| . |
Season-Long Yields
|
| Bermudagrass |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
Average |
| Russell |
8,340 |
11,779 |
7,103 |
9,074 |
| Grazer |
6,365 |
9,747 |
5,079 |
7,064 |
| Tifton 78 |
7,242 |
10,180 |
5,321 |
7,581 |
| Lancaster |
6,079 |
7,470 |
4,744 |
6,098 |
| Pasto Rico |
6,295 |
8,511 |
5,564 |
6,790 |
| Campo Verde |
6,263 |
8,784 |
5,171 |
6,739 |
|
Table 2. First cut and season long
dry matter yields (lb/A) of entries in bermudagrass
variety trial, E. V. Smith Crops Unit,
Shorter, AL, 1992 - 1994.
|
| . |
1992
|
1993
|
1994
|
| BERMUDAGRASS |
FIRST CUT
|
SEASON LONG
|
FIRST CUT
|
SEASON LONG
|
FIRST CUT
|
SEASON LONG
|
| Russell |
6,701 |
23,819 |
7,587 |
18,092 |
5,459 |
19,420 |
| Tifton 85 |
4,920 |
23,736 |
6,822 |
18,984 |
2,910 |
18,064 |
| Coastal |
4,987 |
21,732 |
7,217 |
17,055 |
5,420 |
19,839 |
| Tifton 44 |
5,535 |
22,318 |
6,233 |
14,545 |
4,452 |
18,787 |
| Tifton 78 |
3,841 |
19,377 |
5,684 |
14,396 |
3,192 |
13,835 |
| LSD (.05) |
977 |
- |
1,598 |
- |
. |
. |
|
Table 3. Mean annual forage yields
of Russell and Coastal bermudagrasses, Hill
Farm Research Station, Homer, LA, 1989-92.
|
|
Entry
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
1992
|
Mean
|
| Russell |
17,007 |
17,367 |
12,673 |
23,717 |
17,691 |
| Coastal |
12,897 |
15,051 |
11,666 |
21,030 |
15,161 |
|
Table 4. Visual ratings for stand
establishment, winter survival, and
resistance to leaf-spot disease
for Russell and Coastal bermudagrass.
|
| . |
Stand Est. Winter Survival
|
Resistance to Leaf-Spot Disease
|
|
Entry
|
1988
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
1989
|
1990
|
1991
|
1992
|
| Coastal |
3* |
10** |
8 |
10 |
5*** |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| Russell |
4 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
| *Rating: 5 = very rapid to
1 = very slow. |
| **Rating: 10 = 90 - 100% full
stand to 1 = 0-10% full stand |
| ***Rating: 5 = highly resistant
to 1 = highly susceptible. |
| Table 5. Forage analysis
results (dry matter basis), E.V. Smith
Crops Unit, 1992* |
|
Variety
|
Crude Protein
|
Dig Protein
|
NDF
|
Crude Fiber
|
TDN
|
| Coastal |
12.14 |
7.80 |
72.75 |
32.83 |
52.14 |
| Tifton 44 |
11.45 |
7.15 |
74.00 |
33.32 |
51.37 |
| Tifton 78 |
12.15 |
7.81 |
71.60 |
33.32 |
52.85 |
| Tifton 85 |
12.78 |
8.39 |
73.80 |
33.24 |
51.94 |
| Russell |
11.76 |
7.44 |
72.40 |
32.68 |
52.35 |
| *Average of samples taken
from each of 5 replications. Sample date:
9/22/92. |
|
Table 6. Mean nutritive values of Russell
and Coastal bermudagrass across harvests
and years, 1988-92, Hill Farm Research
Station, Homer, LA.
|
| . |
Nutritive Content
|
|
Entry
|
IVDDM
|
CP
|
NDF
|
ADF
|
AIL
|
| . |
%
|
| Russell |
56.80 |
11.59 |
69.57 |
34.02 |
4.95 |
| Coastal |
58.55 |
12.29 |
69.08 |
32.93 |
4.64 |
| . |
* |
ns |
ns |
ns |
ns |
| ns = Means not significantly
different at P<0.05. |
| * = Means significantly different
at P<0.05. |
|
Table 7. Percentage of Coastal and
Russell bermudagrass stems rooting
at three moisture levels in a greenhouse
environment.
|
| . |
Soil Moisture Level
|
| . |
Low
|
Medium
|
High
|
| Coastal |
24.6 |
27.1 |
44.3 |
| Russell |
32.5 |
73.6 |
80.7 |
<< top |